The alternate voice
You’ve made it clear that you oppose the rail [“Editor’s note,” July 25]; sadly, you are using the Weekly (in ways that go far beyond editorial statements) as a platform to promote your personal stance on this issue, which is absolutely inappropriate.
The editorial comment featured in the concluding paragraph above merely restates the consistent HW position of being opposed to both rail and Hoopili, and concludes with the following sentence, and I quote, “And at least we can, if so inclined, cast a meaningful vote for Cayetano, who has opposed these developments, as well as rail.”
Hardly “absolutely inappropriate”, my friend. I suggest you check out a few recent SA (Star-Advertiser, which has endorsed rail) editorials to see what’s going down.